[1]吴之欧,李 勃.中国社区矫正特别条件之本土化设想 —— 兼顾社区矫正刚性与弹性[J].温州大学学报(社会科学版),2020,(04):046-53.
 WU Zhiou,LI Bo.Localization of the Special Conditions for Community Corrections in China —— Reconciling Rigidity with Flexibility of Community Corrections[J].Journal of Wenzhou University,2020,(04):046-53.
点击复制

中国社区矫正特别条件之本土化设想 —— 兼顾社区矫正刚性与弹性
分享到:

《温州大学学报》(社会科学版)[ISSN:1674-3555/CN:33-1345/C]

卷:
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
046-53
栏目:
社会治理与社会法研究专题
出版日期:
2020-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Localization of the Special Conditions for Community Corrections in China —— Reconciling Rigidity with Flexibility of Community Corrections
作者:
吴之欧1李 勃2
1.温州大学法学院,浙江温州 325035;2.浙江工贸职业技术学院知识产权学院,浙江温州 325035
Author(s):
WU Zhi’ou1 LI Bo2
1. Law School, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, China 325035; 2. School of Intellectual Property, Zhejiang Industry and Trade Vocational College,Wenzhou, China 325035
关键词:
社区矫正特别条件刚性弹性
Keywords:
Community Corrections Special Conditions Rigidity and Flexibility
分类号:
D920.0
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
国内社区矫正工作面临诸多难题是由社区矫正功能定位缺失引发的,社区矫正功能定位又与公众罪罚观念密切联结,以“惩罚与重刑”为核心的公众罪罚观导致当前社区矫正工作呈现出刚性过强的色彩,有必要通过设置特别条件增强社区矫正工作的弹性内核。具体的做法为:把握国际社会与国内社区矫正的共性部分,筛选英美社区矫正体系中有利因素并融入国内制度,形成有中国特色、兼顾多方利益、刚性弹性并存的本土化社区矫正模式。
Abstract:
Many of the challenges facing community corrections in China are caused by the lack of functional positioning of community corrections, which in turn is closely linked to public perceptions of crime and punishment. The public view of crime and punishment, with “punishment and heavy penalties” at its core, has led to the current overly rigid nature of community corrections, and there is a need to strengthen the resilient core of community corrections through the establishment of special conditions. The specific approach is to grasp the commonalities between the international community corrections and the domestic practices, screen the favorable factors in the Anglo-American community correction system and integrate them into the domestic system, so as to form a localized community correction model with Chinese characteristics which takes into account the interests of many parties and has coexistence of rigidity and flexibility.

参考文献/References:

[1] 尹露.中国特色社区矫正的功能定位与进路选择[J].河北法学,2018(10):76-86.
[2] 张振波.论协同治理的生成逻辑与建构路径[J].中国行政管理,2015(1):58-61.
[3] 李钟汉,刘璞.“国家―社会”关系理论视野下社会治理的建构逻辑[J].中国社会科学院研究生院学报,2017(3):107-114.
[4] 董保华,郑少华.社会法:对第三法域的探索[J].华东政法学院学报,1999(1):30-37.
[5] 刘瑞复.新经济法论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1991:27.
[6] 吴宗宪.社区矫正比较研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011:200 -204.
[7] Champion D J. Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections in the United States [M]. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson / Prentice - Hall, 2005: 354.
[8] Clear T R, Dammer H R. The Offender in the Community [M]. 2nd ed. Belmont: Thomson / Wadsworth, 2003: 21.
[9] Paparozzi M, Demichele M. Probation and Parole: Overworked. Misunderstood and Under-appreciated, But why? [J]. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 2008(3): 275 - 296.
[10] 张德军,邢占军.恢复与惩罚:社区矫正功能的双重定位及实现路径[J].理论学刊,2013(12):84-87.
[11] 段启俊,陈丽凤.从社区矫正立法化看我国刑罚趋势[J].湖南师范大学(社会科学学报),2011(3):47-51.
[12] 郭建安.刑罚的历史趋势呼唤行刑体制改革[J].犯罪与改造研究,2000(10):3-6.
[13] 衣家奇.中国非刑罚化改革的否证性分析[J].政法论坛,2005(2):79-86.
[14] Foster B. Corrections: The Fundamentals [M]. Upper Saddle River: Pearson / Prentice - Hall , 2006: 490 -491.
[15] Caputo G A . Intermediate Sanctions in Corrections [M]. Denton: University of North Texas Press, 2004: 5-6.
[16] 罗结珍.法国刑法典[M].北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,1995:36.
[17] Roberts J V. American Attitudes about Punishment: Myth and Reality[C] // Petersilia J. Community Corrections: Probation, Parole and Intermediate Sanctions. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998: 143-149.
[18] 郑永君,张大维.刑罚观与社区矫正的公众认同:基于湖北省调查数据的分析[J].青少年犯罪问题,2016(1):90-98.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-09-28
基金项目:司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(16SFB5013)
作者简介:吴之欧(1977- ),女,浙江温州人,副教授,博士,研究方向:刑法学,刑事政策学
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-25